| |
05-06-2008, 04:37 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
| | Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Oregon
Posts: 923
| 08 Bulletins Bulletin # ALMS 08-04
Weight adjustments for GT-2, including Panoz, Riley C-6, AM Vantage and Doran Ford GT.
__________________
Probae esti in segetem sunt deteriorem datae fruges, tamen ipsae suaptae enitent L.P. |
| |
05-06-2008, 05:49 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
| | Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Bonita Springs, Florida
Posts: 457
| There's a slippery slope.
So, if the "factory" AM GT1 team were to return (hypothetically) would they also receive this competition adjustment? See where I'm going here?
In GT2, I can "maybe" see it with new entries/chassis - but the Panoz?
Oh well... |
| |
05-06-2008, 06:15 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
| | Member
Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Sumter, SC
Posts: 52
| I know that they're IMSA and all, but how does the Vantage qualify for a performance adjustment when it's only ran one race?
Why not the Viper? |
| |
05-06-2008, 07:18 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
| | Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Oregon
Posts: 923
| Quote:
Originally Posted by John Thawley There's a slippery slope.
So, if the "factory" AM GT1 team were to return (hypothetically) would they also receive this competition adjustment? See where I'm going here?
In GT2, I can "maybe" see it with new entries/chassis - but the Panoz?
Oh well... | Not all that slippery,IMO, as it was prefaced with the qualifier.
__________________
Probae esti in segetem sunt deteriorem datae fruges, tamen ipsae suaptae enitent L.P. |
| |
05-06-2008, 10:33 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
| | Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Bonita Springs, Florida
Posts: 457
| Quote:
Originally Posted by HORNDAWG Not all that slippery,IMO, as it was prefaced with the qualifier. | The qualifier IS the slope. |
| |
05-07-2008, 04:22 AM
|
#6 (permalink)
| | Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Oregon
Posts: 923
| Well it allows the Bell entry to be a little more competitive with the Vettes and retains the ability to make sure that the 'works' team does not take advantage.
Also as to the GT-2 weight reduction, I think the Porsche is already running 25kg light (don't know from where, but it is in my head) hence the verbage; Quote: |
The Porsche 911 RSR GT3 may continue at its currently homologated weight
|
__________________
Probae esti in segetem sunt deteriorem datae fruges, tamen ipsae suaptae enitent L.P. |
| |
05-07-2008, 02:04 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
| | Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 329
| Quote:
Originally Posted by HORNDAWG Also as to the GT-2 weight reduction, I think the Porsche is already running 25kg light (don't know from where, but it is in my head) hence the verbage; | Really...Wouldn't their homologated weight be 1225kg? I know they're running 100kg more to get the GT1 sized tires. Where is this 25kg reduction specified? Quote:
ART. 13- WHEELS & TYRES
13.1 - Dimensions :
13.1.1 - Complete wheels (measurements to be made
horizontally at wheel centre line level) :
-------------------------------Up to 1225 kg over 1225 kg
a/ Maximum width :------------ 12"----------------- 14"
b/ Maximum diameter :------- 28" -----------------28" |
Last edited by Nick Koske : 05-07-2008 at 02:11 PM.
|
| |
05-07-2008, 02:15 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
| | Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 329
| Is the Panoz running already with last years adjustments?
Bulletin 07-13 Quote:
Panoz Esperante LMGT engine restrictor size is increased to 29.9 mm. maximum diameter per restrictor (two (2) restrictors per car).
Panoz Esperante LMGT on-board fuel capacity is increased to 95 liters.
| |
| |
05-07-2008, 02:48 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
| | Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Oregon
Posts: 923
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Nick Koske Really...Wouldn't their homologated weight be 1225kg? I know they're running 100kg more to get the GT1 sized tires. Where is this 25kg reduction specified? | Not necessarily, we know that cars are homologated with waivers for certain things all the time and we never hear about them until they become an issue. Like I said in the previous post; quote (don't know from where, but it is in my head). 
__________________
Probae esti in segetem sunt deteriorem datae fruges, tamen ipsae suaptae enitent L.P. |
| |
05-11-2008, 02:35 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
| | Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 7
| Quote:
Originally Posted by wrxinsc I know that they're IMSA and all, but how does the Vantage qualify for a performance adjustment when it's only ran one race?
Why not the Viper? | Teams/Cars not running Michelin tires? |
| |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | |