While I enjoy the WCGT wnd WCTC series, I think the moving target rule book is really unappealing. I have always felt a series should create the best rules they can and let the rule book stand for at least a year before adjusting. Allow the teams to build their car to the best of their given abilities within the structure of those rules and race. Allow the cream to rise to the top and the others aspire to ascend the ladder themselves.
I understand that adjustments are intended to better 'the show'. But, when everyone involved is in a constant state of flux and unhappy, then that word gets out and spread, what have you really created? Nothing but a series full of disruption that at times tarnishes the product.
ALMS seems to have some terrific competition in GT2. The variety of brands has now been broadened with the addition of Lou's Vettes. The success of the Ferraris for example is not being hindered by the series, but rather a bench mark for the others to reach. That's the way it should be.
Lou will do well. He always does. I think with the stable package of ALMS GT2 the burden of guessing what tech bulletin will come out each race is gone. Now all Lou has to do is drive and win. That has to be a relief for him.
But, the question remains, who is the mystery third driver Lou? You can tell your friends here at The Forums.
